The world’s oceans have been fished nearly to the limits of their sustainable yields. With the current state of fisheries, additional production of seafood will have to come mainly from aquaculture. In recent times, mariculture has got a tremendous boost globally owing to technological developments in the field of cage culture and related areas in Norway, other Scandinavian countries, Chile, Japan and Australia. The Norwegian technology has helped countries like Chile to make tremendous foray in the field within a short period of ten years.
Read more about mariculture, a specialized branch of aquaculture involving the cultivation of marine organisms, in this multi-part series.
Candidate species: The aquaculture of high value finfish species, such as groupers, is of increasing importance throughout the Asia-Pacific region, including Australia. The development of large and affluent markets for live reef fish, particularly in Hong Kong and southern China, has increased pressure on wild stock resources. In many areas the demand for live reef fish, and the profitability of this trade, has encouraged overfishing and the use of destructive fishing practices. One such practice is the use of sodium cyanide to ‘stun’ reef fish for capture by divers. Because of the high toxicity of sodium cyanide, many more fishes are killed than are captured live and coral reef areas are devastated. The aquaculture of high value reef fish species can potentially supply product to the live reef fish markets, as well as other regional and domestic markets. The development of aquaculture technology for these species will not only support an economically beneficial aquaculture sector, but will also contribute to reducing pressure on wild stocks. Currently, the major bottlenecks to increased aquaculture production of groupers are the generally poor, and highly variable, survival in larvi culture, and the limited sources of trash fish for grow-out. The important candidate species in our context may be Asian sea bass, Groupers, Snappers and Eels.
Sustainability of commercial mariculture: The major problems pertaining sustainability of mariculture are as follows.
- Nutrient and waste loading of the aquatic environment
- Depletion of marine resource by way of consumption of fish meal and fish oil
Considering the above constraints, R&D efforts are on to meet these challenges and the present developments in this regard are as under.
- Formulation of HND fish feed with FCR of 0.83 and protein sparing effect has made it possible to cut down on the consumption of feed to 44% of what it was in 1972 and brought down nitrogen loading from 180 kg per ton of salmon produced in 1972 to the present level of 30 kg.
- Fish meal content of fish feed has been reduced from to 35 percent today from 70 percent in 1972. Further reduction is being attempted using alternate feed stuff such as soya, rape seed oil and corn gluten. Chinese researchers are working on a yeast-based protein supplement that could reduce use of fish meal by 50 percent. There is a possibility that Spirulina could provide the vital input in this context.
What needs to be done: As regard mariculture of fin fish in inshore and offshore areas is concerned, there are number of gaps in development which needs to be addressed.
1. Formulation of regulatory framework
If these activities are to be increased on a commercial scale, suitable policy framework needs to be developed for leasing of sea bed and marine areas for marine cage fish farming on a sustainable basis without encountering conflict with other resource usages. The need for carrying out aquaculture in environmentally sustainable, socially acceptable and in harmony with principles of common resource use, has led to the formulation of integrated coastal zone management plan by the coastal states as a follow up of 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Such coastal zone planning, based on assessment of holding capacity, nutrient loading from all coastal activities and common resource use needs to be worked out with clear enabling conditions for setting up such ventures.
As regard the formulation of regulatory framework involving studies related to carrying capacity assessment and site selection, suitable agencies needs to be identified with experience and facilities for under taking oceanographic studies. Institutes like National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT), National Institute of Oceanography (NIO) and IITs in the coastal states could be entrusted with such responsibilities on the line of country wide assessment done in Norway.
i. Identification of potential mariculture sites based on seabed conditions, shoreline and hydrographic characteristics, etc.
ii. Assessment of carrying capacity of each site based on coastal zone planning on the pattern of Norwegian ‘lenka system’ or such other models.
iii. Monitoring of physico-chemical characteristics of water and nature of benthos of the marine sites in relation to predetermined standards should form an on-going activity while mariculture operations proceed on expected lines.
2. Assessment of potentials or holding capacity
i. Inshore cage farming: In this connection identification of marine sites, assessment of carrying capacity of the sites, framing of leasing policy of sea beds, etc. have not been carried out. However, based on general knowledge of the Indian coastline it is believed that the Andaman & Nicobar Group of Islands in the Bay of Bengal and Lakshadweep Group of Islands in the Arabian Sea would offer suitable conditions for undertaking such projects. However, a pilot study in this regard needs to be carried out if necessary by utilising services of overseas technology transfer agents, a multilateral funding agency, fisheries research institutes within the country and Indian corporates.
ii. Offshore cage farming: The potentials in this regard needs to be assessed if necessary by engaging overseas consultants. Technology in respect of offshore cage culture involving submersible cages is neither available nor any attempt has been made to develop the same within the country. The Farm Ocean cage system or SARGOTM technology could be useful in this context. A pilot study in this context is also necessary.
3. Technology related to marine cage fish farming
The technologies for inshore cage fish farming and that for offshore areas using submersible type cages (farm ocean cages / solid wall cages) are at present not available within the country. Since the technologies in this connection are very exacting and capital intensive, only big corporate houses may be able to master the resources to undertake these activities. It may not be possible to develop in-house technology within a reasonable time frame considering the high degree of automation and the high cost / sophisticated nature of R&D involved. A pilot study with external assistance under bilateral funding could be considered for transfer of technology. The possibilities of supporting adaptive research involving our research agencies of repute and appropriate technology transfer agent could be explored. An appropriate overseas technology transfer agent in this regard needs to be identified for the purpose. Such technology transfer could involve the following exercise to start with.
i. Identification of appropriate technology for cage fish farming in marine inshore and offshore areas and foreign technology transfer agent for the same.
ii. Identification of suitable species for cage culture in marine conditions and a suitable technology transfer agent for the same. May be sea bass will meet the requirement of the sector.
iii. Identification of suitable research institutes within the country in the field of mariculture, which could conduct an adaptive trail with collaboration with the foreign technology transfer agent that would enable verification of the end results as well as adoption of the technology and assessment of the production parameters. Probably ICAR has the requisite mandate in this regard and could associate for the marine cage fish farming trials.
iv. Identification of a suitable research institute within the country, which could take care of the technical know-how relating engineering aspect of site selection, cage design, fabrication and installation. This could ultimately facilitate indigenization of the cage system and its manufacture by an Indian manufacturer. Since NIOT, Chennai, IIT Kharagpur and IIT Chennai are engaged in research and development related to aquaculture engineering and has several departments with requisites expertise in the related fields, these institutes may be best poised to undertake the job.
v. Before any step is taken in the above direction, it may be pertinent to conduct a meet with the industry to find out its response to the technology transfer program. A national meet with the policy makers and research agencies to discuss the various aspects of the program and the need to develop suitable policy frameworks in this context is a basic requirement. 